Sanctions
imposed
held concealed evidence
against the falsely accused.
There is a very very BIG LIE
in the following Judgement.
In reality, the "Probable Cause" was "Concealed Evidence"
when I tried to have it revealed on 2/16/1993, since
it contained critical evidence of "Malice", the
Judge decided to keep it concealed.
You can see that for yourself at:
http://www.judici.com/courts/cases/case_history.jsp?court=IL081025J&ocl=IL081025J,1990SC3806,IL081025JL1990SC3806P1
He does it by excusing the witnesses
before they could testify.
Now that we know there was no valid "Probable Cause" this judgement makes other statements.
This judgement states a concealed "Probable Cause" can be replaced by false assumptions.
This judgement states the "Malice" on the concealed "Probable Cause" does not exist.
This judgement rules against Judge Telleen that actually knew "Malice" existed.
First overlooked argument against the following decision.
Last overlooked argument against the following.
About half way down on the left hand side it says
"supported by probable cause" and it should say
"supported by a *concealed* probable cause" which could have concealed evidence
of Malice too.
In other words, all my arguing about the definition of "Probable Cause" never
being applied at all was
thrown out the window by making it look like it was applied! A TOTAL LIE!!!
Much more on the Judgement above, that just appears to be
just a way for three judges
Honorable Michael P. McCuskey, Honorable Peg Breslin and HonorableTobias Barry
just to get their names in 3 law books can be found at:
http://DesecratedSixthAmendment.com